Your Take: Strength in Numbers
On Tuesday, Blake reviewed Sara Evans’ new single “A Little Bit Stronger,” sparking a debate about some of the songwriters responsible for many of country music’s modern hits.
The tune is part of the catalogs of in-demand Nashville songwriters Hillary Lindsey and Lady Antebellum’s Hillary Scott, whose names are closely related with other of-the-moment songwriters Ashley Gorley, Chris Lindsey, Jeffrey Steele and Aimee Mayo.
Commenter Kyle took note, offering up his thoughts on these “genre-defining” songwriters:
It’s always interesting for me to see who the “hot” songwriters are at a given time, and how their style affects what’s being put out. Right now, everyone and their mother seems to want a Akins/Hayslip/Davidson song, and everyone and their mother wants a Hilary Scott/Lady A song. Unfortunately, I think that’s resulting in a lot of hooky but production-driven, inconsequential, simple songs that you get the feeling will be quickly forgotten.
I don’t have anything against Hilary – I think she’s a great writer for her age – but I don’t think she’s good enough to be in that genre-defining position, nor do I think those other three are. Hopefully somebody who packs a little more punch steps in and gets hot soon.
Country music has a history of developing close-knit songwriting communities – from Harlan Howard, Bill Anderson and Dallas Frazier to those listed above – that often work together and are behind the sound and trends of their generations’ popular artists. Commenter Fizz, however, expressed his thoughts that this approach increases the homogenization of the music:
If you have the same small group of people writing most of the hits, then SURPRISE! they’re going to sound pretty similar. For real! Of course, folks could always write their own damn songs, but I guess that’s just me attempting to apply rock aesthetics to country music again.
In the same thread, Jon countered that diversity doesn’t automatically equal supremacy:
Why is greater diversity intrinsically preferable? If fabulous results can be produced by small pools of songwriters (like, for instance, back in the 50s and 60s), then why is having a small pool of songwriters a bad thing? Greater diversity sure hasn’t produced stellar results on a song-by-song basis, like when you have 5 or 6 or 7 names on a song, has it?
What’s your take? Do a small number of hit-producing songwriters warrant less diversity and variety available to country music artists and fans? To answer Jon’s question in the thread, is greater diversity intrinsically preferable, with more quality results?
Also, to Kyle’s point, is the current crop of hot songwriters helping or hurting the industry? Who are the up-and-coming songwriters that country fans should keep an eye on?
- Leeann: Wow! I love that Holly William's cover of "No Surrender"! She's gotten to be so good.
- luckyoldsun: I made it through a minute of that "Girl In a Country Song Video." Man, that sucks.
- lindsay thomas: Wife and I saw these guys last Thursday night, (7-24-14) at the Ryman in Nashville. What a show. …
- Donald: I'm guessing that is meant to read 're-release' Detroit to Wheeling, as the double album originally appeared on Pinecastle in …
- Michael A.: Has anyone else had a difficult time trying to get the free download from the Reba site?
- Dave D.: I can't believe that I never saw the Willie Nelson Monk episode - and it was a Sharona episode, as …
- nm: Taylor Swift was on CSI once. Not only was Steve Earle on The Wire, in one episode Omar quoted him about …
- Barry Mazor: It's only a slight stretch to recall when Jimmy Dean met James Bond: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbwDGtj84YY
- Arlene: I suspect you'll also be including an episode of L.A. Law....
- luckyoldsun: The Johnny Cash episode was the one Columbo case where you really felt "the b--- had it coming."