Roots Watch: Frets and Threats
No, that’s not a suggested name for the next big music magazine; Frets & Threats could have some real breadth and staying power, but I figure the magazine market is too threatened for a launch right now.
I bring this up after a week at IBMA’s “World of Bluegrass,” 2011 edition, which was marked by music as provocative and comforting, enthusiastically homemade and immaculately professional as ever, in a genre that’s both remarkably inclusive and demandingly selective, and which had the push-and-pull of the traditional and the groundbreaking built-in at birth. It was also a week marked by a great deal of heavy public consternation about closely related traditional topics that now seem as Old As the Hills— “Will bluegrass survive, because things are, y’know, changing and all, and some folks keep wanting to muck with it? And “How big is this tent?”
Some of the fretting, (the variety that does not require strings), was reignited by Infamous Stringduster Chris Pandolfi’s pointed keynote address, which included the comment “We need to agree to disagree on the question of what is bluegrass.” His suggestion, essentially, was that the evolving expanded use (some would say misuse) of the term itself—which is regularly applied to any sort of acoustic, somehow country or folk jam music by many with no particular grounding in the field—be accepted as useful by IBMA and bluegrassers generally, as an opportunity for expansion. Whatever people think bluegrass is, just say yes. This being 2011, this was taken up in terms of branding, the variety that does not require cattle. There were even suggestions expressed here and there during the business conference part of the Week that a way not to fudge the term “bluegrass” might be renaming the association something like “The International Bluegrass and Acoustic Music Association.” (I doubt that that’s being seriously entertained.)
Pandolfi’s much-lauded band has chosen to focus on venues, sometimes large ones, friendly to broad younger audiences who often want to dance to the music and drink beer as they do, and they’re basically inclined to keep calling the proficient, Infamous acoustic jamming music they do “bluegrass” in any case. There are those—often, but not always, older participants— within the bluegrass realm to whom the whole atmosphere suggested by the combination is repugnant, mainly on the grounds that this is supposed to be music for attentive listening. And there are plenty who feel the brand of music involved would inevitably dilute the genre, pushing traditional bluegrass aside. The tension was exhibited repeatedly in conference discussions such as “What Bluegrass Can Learn from Jam Bands,” and crowd-sourced sessions in which attendees could pick important topics for discussion. (One turned out to be “How do we attract younger audiences?” and another “How do we keep older ones if the younger ones show up?”)
It is not surprising that any of us attracted to any variety of roots music, bluegrass very much included, worry that our genre of choice will survive and thrive—and that the “Original Undiluted Version” will continue to be around. Depth accumulated over time is part of the attraction, and the attraction runs deep. It seems to me that the reason these questions are rising in bluegrass right now, though, is because of the added, and very general, added tension of being in harder times. It’s expensive for people (fans and bands alike) to go to conferences, to regional festivals, or pay for tickets—even in a genre which has been pretty good about keeping ticket prices humane most of the time, which bluegrass has. It’s pretty tough all over; the genre’s challenged along with much else, if not credibly threatened, and those who care, fret.
But there are good reasons not to. That traditional/newfangled tension really is basic in bluegrass, and probably—to its credit and benefit– everlasting. In a conversation with Jerry Douglas not too long ago, I was reminiscing about bands that were standing outside of newgrass shows in the 1970s with handouts reading, “Don’t go in here; come to our real bluegrass show tonight at xxx…” To which the experienced Mr. Douglas replied, laughing, “Those guys are still there!” At the International Bluegrass Music Awards this past week, host Sam Bush pointedly noted, in regards to the Bill Monroe 100th birthday celebrations, “By playing his music our way, we take it into the 21st Century.” Sam recalled a young songwriter who showed Monroe a song he’d labored over to make exactly like one the bluegrass founder would have written, and with success, to which Monroe replied “But what can you do on your own?”
The awards saluted such tradition-acknowledging artists as J.D. Crowe, Doyle Lawson and Paul Williams, a band like Michael Cleveland & Flamekeeper (ponder the name!) and for Song of the Year, “Trains I Missed” from Balsam Range. A train song, folks. Yes there are successful bluegrass bands with walking around microphones that sound like modern country, bands with drums and electric bass, bands that cross the lines into jamband land. But the traditional is also healthy. Replication of 1946 is no more likely to be the Next Big Thing in bluegrass than medieval and harpsichord are likely to explode in classical (another field being impacted by audience change)—but there are plenty of people playing those and audiences still attending, with centuries gone by. Bluegrass has held on where so many country sidecar genres have gotten locked in time and withered because it was built capable of evolution, and it’s evolved. That’s a fundamental strength, not a weakness. As Del McCoury, an artist repeatedly cited as a traditionalist who’s figured how to take that sound anywhere, noted as he was admitted to the Bluegrass Hall of Fame this past week, “The state of bluegrass is better than it’s ever been.” Trust Del.
By the way: An early warning of excellent incoming —namely a driving new band I caught at a Lower Broad bar during IBMA, Della Mae— a quintet of young women that includes National Fiddle Champion Kimber Ludiker, Courtney Hartman, a flatpicker out of the Berklee College of Music, and, the startling part, a lead singer-songwriter, Celia Woodsmith, who steps forward with a sexy, bluesy alto that leads the totality to surprising, very good places. Imagine this as an accomplished all-female SteelDrivers, or a new equivalent of, say, Tracy Nelson with a hot string band and back-up harmonies. I’m told that Della Mae will have a CD out on Rounder within weeks. Watch for it.
- Janice Brooks: Hopes somebody gets those memos about drinking songs. Meanwhile I'm feeling a lot of slots with Bluegrass.
- Leeann: Great news about Ricky Skaggs and Sharon White's duet album! Absolutely appalling about the Keith Urban concert!! Both the rape and …
- bob: I found the Billboard article about country music radio needing an alcohol intervention interesting. Songwriter Adam Wright is quoted as …
- Matt: Definitely agree with C.M. about Maddie & Tae. Certainly not the tidal wave of change some claimed it is or …
- Dave D.: Good stuff, as always. My copy of Producing Country arrived yesterday, and it looks to be as good as …
- Scooter: I agree Holly Williams can do no wrong in my eyes. Such a good album and great to see live …
- Carrie Mclaughlin: Your my Hero Mr. Jim Lauderdale!!! Come to Alaska Please? hehehehe
- Jeremy Dylan: You should check it out Dave D. It's from the first (and strongest) season.
- Leeann: Wow! I love that Holly William's cover of "No Surrender"! She's gotten to be so good.
- luckyoldsun: I made it through a minute of that "Girl In a Country Song Video." Man, that sucks.